Conclusion

The implications of the University’s involvement in racialism, and of having Lord Salisbury as its figurehead are too enormous for criticism to be brushed off simply as “a personal emotion”. Yet this is how H. B. Chrimes, the Treasurer, reacted for the administration on 9th March. At some stage the University must make a decisive break and refuse to be complicit in any way – either through having a Chancellor with views like Lord Salisbury’s or having investments in companies which support apartheid – with any kind of racialism, either here or abroad. And if the University does not do this, the reason must be apparent:  it is an institution controlled by, and in the interests of, a business class which has everything to lose by severing connections with the racist regimes in Rhodesia and South Africa.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s